Remuneration packages hit hard by company pension commitments
Released on: December 4, 2007, 11:40 pm
Press Release Author: Iain Martin
Industry:
Press Release Summary: Almost half of UK companies (49%) feel that the increased costs of funding their defined benefit (DB) pension scheme has impacted negatively on the remuneration packages their company is able to offer, with almost the same number (48%) feeling that this will continue to be the case in the future.
Press Release Body: Almost half of UK companies (49%) feel that the increased costs of funding their defined benefit (DB) pension scheme has impacted negatively on the remuneration packages their company is able to offer, with almost the same number (48%) feeling that this will continue to be the case in the future.
This is according to research released today by Aon Consulting, a leading pension, benefits and HR consulting firm, who surveyed representatives from the UK's largest DB schemes about the impact that funding these schemes had on their company's ability to compete, their share price, the price of goods and services and remuneration package.
More than one in five companies (22%) also felt that the increasing cost of funding their DB schemes is impacting negatively on their share price, with a fifth (20%) anticipating that this will continue to be the case in the future. However, these figures have decreased significantly since Aon conducted similar research in 2006, when more than a third of companies (36%) felt that the increased costs of funding their DB scheme was impacting their share price, rising to 38% when asked if this would be the case in the future.
Paul McGlone, principal and senior actuary at Aon Consulting, said: "The funding of defined benefit schemes is still a considerable problem for many UK companies. With the rising equity markets and the rise in bond yields that we have seen over the past year, the strain many companies seem to have been under regarding their pension scheme does appear to have eased slightly."
The research also highlighted a marked relaxation among companies to the impact of pension funding costs on their competitiveness. Almost a third of companies (31%) were concerned that the increased cost of funding their DB scheme is already negatively affecting their ability to compete effectively (compared to 50% in 2006). This rose to 36% when asked if their projected pension commitments in the future would continue to impact negatively on their ability to compete (compared to 58% in 2006).
Rising pension costs associated with DB schemes were also seen to be having an impact on the price of goods and services, with 30% of companies stating that they have already had to increase prices. Looking ahead, a third (33%) of those surveyed forecast that pension costs would continue to increase the upward pressure on the cost of their goods and services in the future. However, company concerns were weaker than in the 2006 survey when 40% of companies stated that they had already had to increase their prices due to rising pension costs and 54% forecasting continued price increases.
Mr McGlone continued: "Based on the survey results, the message from the employers seems to be that the cost of pension deficits is most likely to be met by changes to employee remuneration, with customers being hit second, and shareholders suffering least from the pension debts. It is logical that companies will take this approach given that employees are the ones who will benefit from the pension scheme. However it will still grate with some employees and unions.
"Overall, it is encouraging that company concerns over the negative impacts of funding defined pension schemes are decreasing. This is probably due to a combination of factors, including market conditions, additional contributions to shore up pension deficits, and better risk management techniques being put in place to reduce the likelihood of similar issues occurring in future."
Notes to editors:
The research surveyed 150 UK companies operating defined benefit pension schemes between November 2006 and February 2007.
Of the companies surveyed:
* 26.5% operated schemes that were open to new members and accrual * 59.1% operated schemes that were closed to new members but continued to accrue benefits * 14.4% operated schemes that were closed to new members and accrual
About Aon Consulting
Aon Consulting is a leading human capital consultancy, helping organisations of every size to attract and keep the employees they need. We advise on all aspects of employment, including health-related insurance and risk; employee compensation and pensions; human resource strategy planning; job design and change management; and staff assessment and legal issues. Aon Consulting is a division of Aon, one of the UK's largest insurance brokers and providers of risk management services and a major force in reinsurance and the UK human capital consulting market. Aon Consulting Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.builder\'s insurance
Aon UK is ranked by A.M. Best as the number one global insurance brokerage based on brokerage revenues and voted best insurance intermediary, offering classic car insurance, high value home insurance, entertainment and media liability insurance and builder\'s insurance.
Web Site: http://www.commercialservices.aon.co.uk/commercialservices/microsites/construction/